At this point I don't think any of us could say we are surprised. What remains somewhat surprising, or at at minimum, consistently disappointing, is how indifferent and complicit larger media and the public are. It's not that I expect Good Morning America to feature this on their 8:02 AM segment, but if it weren't for people like Jacob, most people wouldn't stand a chance of learning about this. Thank you.
Gosh - what an insane time. And thanks so much for the kudos, Keith! That's why we created SciLight - to cover these incredibly important topics in a fragmented media environment.
I lead a team of 35 Professors at Universities who participate in the Expert and Government Review of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reports for the Global Change Group of the National Academy of Sciences. The Global Change Group was shut down because of this. There reports are deliberate science fiction. As an example, when Jim Skea the liar said we need to lower carbon dioxide by 45% by 2030 he was basing that statement on a paragraph buried on page 95 in the SR 1.5 report. That paragraph has no references. They made it up. We forced them to move it to page 6 of the AR6 report paragraph b.1.3. Also for working group 1 for SR 1.5 we found the Global Warming Potential model was fake. It wasn’t benchmarked with the data in annex two (appendix two). Also their fake model assumes equal concentrations of greenhouse gases which will never happen carbon dioxide is 219 times more concentrated than methane. Also they ignore the below cure taught is every college chemistry and physics classes since the 1940’s. Any Bill which brings in money for climate change that money must be paid the Climate Change Truth Inc. cctruth.org The United Nations has 20 “Emissions gap” scientists whom are supposed to review the IPCC reports. However they only review the lying summary for policy makers which don’t match anything in their reports. The IPCC woke scientists make the Summary for Policy of what the United nations wants to hear which matches their false agenda. Cctruth.org
Also, if I'm not mistaken, there's a team somewhere (at a university?) that has scraped the federal climate data and is storing it somewhere. Gotta look into this again. They did it under the past Trump regime, and are continuing it now.
I lead a team of 35 Professors at Universities who participate in the Expert and Government Review of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reports for the Global Change Group of the National Academy of Sciences. The Global Change Group was shut down because of this. There reports are deliberate science fiction. As an example, when Jim Skea the liar said we need to lower carbon dioxide by 45% by 2030 he was basing that statement on a paragraph buried on page 95 in the SR 1.5 report. That paragraph has no references. They made it up. We forced them to move it to page 6 of the AR6 report paragraph b.1.3. Also for working group 1 for SR 1.5 we found the Global Warming Potential model was fake. It wasn’t benchmarked with the data in annex two (appendix two). Also their fake model assumes equal concentrations of greenhouse gases which will never happen carbon dioxide is 219 times more concentrated than methane. Also they ignore the below cure taught is every college chemistry and physics classes since the 1940’s. Any Bill which brings in money for climate change that money must be paid the Climate Change Truth Inc. cctruth.org The United Nations has 20 “Emissions gap” scientists whom are supposed to review the IPCC reports. However they only review the lying summary for policy makers which don’t match anything in their reports. The IPCC woke scientists make the Summary for Policy of what the United nations wants to hear which matches their false agenda. Cctruth.org
Gold Standard... where those with the gold and willingness to tithe to the Great Leader get to decide, on the basis of how better science based knowledge disseminated widely affects their short and medium term profitability.
The splash page climate.gov has been redirected, but climate.gov data seems to be there for the most part. You need to enter it through a back alley. Go to https://www.climate.gov/maps-data and hit the dropdown to get into some of the maps and data. I'm sure, though, that all of these sites will be removed soon, too.
Right - there is still stuff there (although some of the content has been taken down). But I think the bigger picture of the changes, and the cited guidance, points to political control over the science and public access.
At this point I don't think any of us could say we are surprised. What remains somewhat surprising, or at at minimum, consistently disappointing, is how indifferent and complicit larger media and the public are. It's not that I expect Good Morning America to feature this on their 8:02 AM segment, but if it weren't for people like Jacob, most people wouldn't stand a chance of learning about this. Thank you.
Gosh - what an insane time. And thanks so much for the kudos, Keith! That's why we created SciLight - to cover these incredibly important topics in a fragmented media environment.
I lead a team of 35 Professors at Universities who participate in the Expert and Government Review of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reports for the Global Change Group of the National Academy of Sciences. The Global Change Group was shut down because of this. There reports are deliberate science fiction. As an example, when Jim Skea the liar said we need to lower carbon dioxide by 45% by 2030 he was basing that statement on a paragraph buried on page 95 in the SR 1.5 report. That paragraph has no references. They made it up. We forced them to move it to page 6 of the AR6 report paragraph b.1.3. Also for working group 1 for SR 1.5 we found the Global Warming Potential model was fake. It wasn’t benchmarked with the data in annex two (appendix two). Also their fake model assumes equal concentrations of greenhouse gases which will never happen carbon dioxide is 219 times more concentrated than methane. Also they ignore the below cure taught is every college chemistry and physics classes since the 1940’s. Any Bill which brings in money for climate change that money must be paid the Climate Change Truth Inc. cctruth.org The United Nations has 20 “Emissions gap” scientists whom are supposed to review the IPCC reports. However they only review the lying summary for policy makers which don’t match anything in their reports. The IPCC woke scientists make the Summary for Policy of what the United nations wants to hear which matches their false agenda. Cctruth.org
Also, if I'm not mistaken, there's a team somewhere (at a university?) that has scraped the federal climate data and is storing it somewhere. Gotta look into this again. They did it under the past Trump regime, and are continuing it now.
I lead a team of 35 Professors at Universities who participate in the Expert and Government Review of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reports for the Global Change Group of the National Academy of Sciences. The Global Change Group was shut down because of this. There reports are deliberate science fiction. As an example, when Jim Skea the liar said we need to lower carbon dioxide by 45% by 2030 he was basing that statement on a paragraph buried on page 95 in the SR 1.5 report. That paragraph has no references. They made it up. We forced them to move it to page 6 of the AR6 report paragraph b.1.3. Also for working group 1 for SR 1.5 we found the Global Warming Potential model was fake. It wasn’t benchmarked with the data in annex two (appendix two). Also their fake model assumes equal concentrations of greenhouse gases which will never happen carbon dioxide is 219 times more concentrated than methane. Also they ignore the below cure taught is every college chemistry and physics classes since the 1940’s. Any Bill which brings in money for climate change that money must be paid the Climate Change Truth Inc. cctruth.org The United Nations has 20 “Emissions gap” scientists whom are supposed to review the IPCC reports. However they only review the lying summary for policy makers which don’t match anything in their reports. The IPCC woke scientists make the Summary for Policy of what the United nations wants to hear which matches their false agenda. Cctruth.org
Gold Standard... where those with the gold and willingness to tithe to the Great Leader get to decide, on the basis of how better science based knowledge disseminated widely affects their short and medium term profitability.
The splash page climate.gov has been redirected, but climate.gov data seems to be there for the most part. You need to enter it through a back alley. Go to https://www.climate.gov/maps-data and hit the dropdown to get into some of the maps and data. I'm sure, though, that all of these sites will be removed soon, too.
Right - there is still stuff there (although some of the content has been taken down). But I think the bigger picture of the changes, and the cited guidance, points to political control over the science and public access.
Right. The surveillance of science in the EO cuts deeper than I think even the principals realize.